UPC News

Recent UPC News

Unified Patent Court captures 15% of European patent litigation but still far from being primary European patent court

Commentary by Partner Nicholas Fox has been featured in Law Society Gazette, Law Society of Ireland Gazette, World IP Review, Life Sciences Intellectual Property Review, The Canadian Lawyer and The… read more…

Update on Mathys & Squire test case in support of open justice

Mathys & Squire filed a test case to secure public access to evidence in the Unified Patent Court (UPC) at the end of November 2023 That case was stayed, pending the UPC Court of Appeal’s… read more…

UPC releases pleadings to the public, but questions remain

Commentary by Partner Nicholas Fox has been featured in  Law360 and World IP Review giving an insight into the implications of the Court of Appeal’s ruling that a member of the public can have… read more…

How do opposition rates impact opt-outs?

By default, European patents granted by the European Patent Office (EPO) in effect in countries participating in the Unified Patent Court (UPC) are subject to the jurisdiction of that Court However,… read more…

Court hearing on public access to evidence in Unified Patent Court to be held in February 2024

The outcome of the test case filed by Mathys & Squire to secure public access to evidence in the Unified Patent Court (UPC) is expected early in 2024 Commentary provided by Mathys & Squire… read more…

Mathys & Squire files UPC test case in support of open justice

Mathys & Squire has filed a test case to secure public access to evidence in the Unified Patent Court (UPC) Commentary provided by Mathys & Squire has been featured in Commercial Dispute… read more…

Surge in AI legal cases as companies urgently await clarity on copyright issues

Data and commentary provided by Mathys & Squire has featured in an article by The Trademark Lawyer and Solicitors Journal, giving an insight into the issues that companies face amidst the recent… read more…

100 days on from launch of Europe’s new patent courts system

Data and commentary provided by Mathys & Squire has featured in an article by The Patent Lawyer and Solicitors Journal, giving an insight into the system’s growth since its introduction An… read more…

Milan officially confirmed as host city for third branch of UPC Central Division

According to an announcement this week from the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, agreement has officially been reached to situate a third branch of the Unified Patent Court (UPC) Central… read more…

The official launch of the Unified Patent Court and the Unitary Patent system

Today, 1 June 2023, marks the launch of the Unified Patent Court (UPC) and the Unitary Patent (UP) system after many years of preparation by the European Union and its members As of today, the UPC… read more…

Unified Patent Court confirms allocation of cases in IPC sections A and C between Paris and Munich

As the Unified Patent Court (UPC) launch date approaches, the question on everyone’s mind regarding the placement of the third branch of the central division has finally been answered Following… read more…

The Unified Patent Court: five reasons to factor the UPC into your patent strategy

The start date for the Unified Patent Court (UPC) will be 1 June 2023 This will also be the date on which the Unitary Patent (UP) system comes into effect  Thus, many patent holders are currently… read more…

Germany gives go ahead for Unified Patent Court – signalling long-awaited start of new EU patents system

Germany has finalised its approval of the Unified Patent Court (UPC), opening the UPC’s case management system and kicking off the court’s sunrise period from 1 March The start date for the UPC… read more…

New Unified Patent Court may tilt playing field in favour of ‘patent trolls’

Commentary provided by Mathys & Squire has featured in an article by The Patent Lawyer, providing an update on the UPC and ‘patent trolls’ An extended version of the press release is… read more…

Supplementary protection certificates: ambiguity over the Unified Patent Court’s jurisdiction and opt-outs

The Unified Patent Court (UPC) – which is expected to launch in April 2023 – will have jurisdiction not only for patent litigation, but also for litigation involving supplementary protection… read more…

Unitary patent and national prior rights – wider geographical limitation of protection

The unitary effect and the Unified Patent Court (UPC) system comes with a wider aspect as to validity against national prior rights (national applications with an earlier priority date but a… read more…

Unified Patent Court confirms panel of 85 judges is now in place

Data and commentary provided by Mathys & Squire, as published in Legal Week, provides an update on the appointment of Unified Patent Court judges An extended version of the press release is… read more…

The Unitary Patent: Possible options ahead of the EPO’s transitional measures

Although the Unified Patent Court (UPC) is anticipated to open its doors around March 2023 and European patent holders and applicants are busy reviewing their European patent portfolios to decide… read more…

Unified Patent Court begins to appoint judges in major step forward for single IP enforcement system

Data provided by Mathys & Squire has featured in articles by City AM  and The Patent Lawyer providing an update on the launch of the Unified Patent Court An extended version of… read more…

UPC representation rights for European patent attorneys

The final version of the Rules on Representation before the UPC has now been published, and we are pleased to confirm that all our UK, French and German attorneys will be able to represent our… read more…

UPC newsflash: EPO announces two transitional measures to enable early uptake of Unitary Patent

The European Patent Office (EPO) has announced the introduction of transitional measures to encourage applicants towards an early uptake of the Unitary Patent effect Details can be found here, but… read more…

The Unitary Patent approaches the finish line: What’s next for patent owners?

Good things come to those who wait After years of seemingly little to no progress and challenging negotiations, and with the Unitary Patent (UP) being on the verge of introduction several times, the… read more…

Federal Constitutional Court clears the way for the UPC

Following delays throughout 2020 (see previous article here), on Friday 9 July 2021, the Federal Constitutional Court ruled on two urgent applications against the ratification of the Unified Patent… read more…

Unified Patent Court faces further delays

At the end of 2020 the German parliament passed (for the second time) the legislation necessary for Germany to ratify the Unified Patent Court Agreement (UPCA) This followed a ruling earlier in 2020… read more…

Latest developments on the unitary patent system

Background The efforts to create a unified patent system in Europe are now well advanced The agreement on a unified European Patent Court has been coordinated at European level and is now… read more…

The UPC: a model for a new UK/EU court system?

Mathys & Squire Partner and patent attorney, Caroline Warren, explores whether the Unified Patent Court (UPC) changes the landscape for court structures in the UK and EU Unified Patent Court:… read more…

AfD challenges to the UPC Agreement

The acts that passed through the German Parliament to enable ratification of the Unified Patent Court (UPC) Agreement are now being challenged by the opposition party, Alternative für Deutschland… read more…

House of Commons approves draft UPC legislation

The UK Parliament has advised that the House of Commons approved the draft Unified Patent Court (Immunities and Privileges) Order 2017 yesterday This draft Order must also be approved… read more…

Further delays likely for start date of the UPC

It has been 40 years in the making and it was widely considered that the Unified Patent Court Agreement (UPCA), which builds on the success of the established European Patent Organisation and aims to… read more…

UPC & UP Hub

This hub has been created to provide updates on current developments in the Unified Patent Court (UPC) landscape, and to identify the potential implications for your patent portfolio. To put these implications into perspective, we have prepared an interactive questionnaire below to help you consider how your patent litigation and patent filing strategies may be affected; and to support your approach to the UPC going forward.

Our experts will also be hosting a series of tailored workshops to offer further guidance, support in developing a Unitary Patent (UP) and UPC strategy for your IP portfolio and to answer your questions around these new and complex topics. For further information, download our UPC and UP resources below:

Interactive UPC tool

We understand that every business and every patent portfolio is different, and that the UPC presents different opportunities and raise different issues for each of our clients. With this in mind, we have therefore developed an interactive UPC tool that you can use to start preparing a UPC strategy for your business. Once you have completed the 12 questions below, a radial diagram will be generated, to help visualise your current position within six key aspects to consider when making a decision on UPC participation. We hope that you find this tool informative and helpful for considering some of the main issues that the UPC raises for your patent portfolio, and for identifying opportunities offered by the new UPC system that may benefit your business whilst minimising the risks.

Disclaimer: This tool is not intended to give definitive advice or to be acted upon in isolation. Please contact your usual Mathys & Squire attorney or email us at [email protected] to discuss these results and your UPC strategy in more detail.

Interactive UPC tool
Q1) How many granted EP patents do you hold that are in force?
Q2) How many EP applications in prosecution do you hold?
Q3) How many EP applications do you file per year?
Q4) How many EPC jurisdiction(s) covered by the UPC do you validate/hold patents in?
Do you additionally validate in the UK?
Q5) Do you actively track your competition to understand if their products/services are likely to infringe your patents in Europe?
Q6) How frequently do you negotiate with a competitor in the EU without litigating?
Q7) How frequently do you litigate against a competitor in an EPC jurisdiction covered by the UPC?
Q8) What is the risk of a competitor pursuing litigation (nullity actions) against you in Europe?
Q9) What sector(s) do you predominantly operate in? (please see list of core industries/our practice areas)
Q10) What is the average lifespan of your EP patent validations?
Q11) Do you actively manage and/or selectively renew your EP patent family over the lifetime of your patents?
Q12) Is your EP intellectual property portfolio likely to be assigned or licensed?
Axis definition:

1) Invalidation risk – It measures how high the risk of your portfolio being invalidated is.

2) Annuity cost saving – The UPC provides the opportunity to renew a patent with unitary effect in a centralised manner. This means that only one renewal fee must be paid per year generating the unitary effect for all member states. This single renewal fee will be significantly lower than the overall amount of all renewal fees of all member states in combination. Therefore, the UP will provide cheaper annuities in relation to the provided territorial scope.

3) Geographic portfolio management – A UP is a single unified patent right. It is therefore not possible to reduce annuity costs during the lifetime of the patent by selectively renewing the patent only in certain countries. It is also not possible to assign a unified patent to different entities for different countries. Therefore, while a UP can simplify management of a European portfolio, it can restrict options for active per-territory management over the lifetime of a patent.

4) Territorial scope – The UP provides an opportunity to cover multiple countries with a single patent. This is in contrast to the current EP system where a patent granted by the EPO must be ‘validated’ on a country-by-country basis. If you are interested in patent coverage in many European countries, a UP potentially offers protection over a similar or wider range of countries with a simplified validation procedure and reduced renewal costs compared to the current system.

5) Centralised litigation opportunity – The UPC provides the opportunity to litigate a patent infringement within one single case across all UPC member states. Compared to the present system with its separate national litigation, this reduces the complexity and costs significantly for a patent holder. Additionally, the risk for an alleged infringer resulting from this single litigation is increased which may provide a stronger negotiation position for the patentee.

6) Geographic licence and assignment management – UPs cannot be assigned to different legal entities in different countries, so if this is part of your likely patent strategy, then a UP may not be for you. Moreover, while a UP can be licensed on a per-country basis, licensing of a single patent right in this way is likely to be more complex and it may be beneficial simply to validate the patent in individual territories to allow simpler licensing of the individual rights.

If you would like to receive a copy of your results, with an interpretation of each of your axes’ scores and their implications for your portfolio via email, please fill in your contact details below.

Following many years of work, the Unified Patent Court (UPC) and Unitary Patent have now come into existence with effect from 1 June 2023. The sunrise period is now over, but you can still file opt-outs for existing patents and patent applications.

Catch up on everything that has happened so far by visiting our UPC articles archive.

FAQs

What is the Unitary Patent?

The Unitary Patent (UP) is a patent that has effect and is enforceable across 17 European countries. Although some European countries are not yet participating, the UP is an alternative to the existing standard European Patent (EP) for many countries and it might be of strategic benefit to own UPs, as well as EPs, which can cover jurisdictions outside of the UP territory.

More countries might join the system in future, meaning that Unitary Patents granted in the future will provide correspondingly greater coverage.

You will find guidance and useful information around what to consider for your own strategic approach to the UP system in the UP brochure below.

What is the difference between a Unitary Patent and a European Patent?

A traditional EP takes effect in those countries where it is validated after grant. Each of those individual patent rights must then be renewed annually in each of the countries of validation and enforced at the national level, making it a costly overall endeavour. A UP on the other hand takes effect in all participating member states without the need for national validation, meaning there is only one renewal fee to be paid for coverage across the member countries.

However, in the same way that patent protection applies to all of the UP countries, any invalidation action may result in the patent being revoked in all of those countries too.

For more information on what may happen after you have chosen unitary effect for your patents, please refer to our UPC brochure below. 

What is the cost of the Unitary Patent?

The UP renewal fees are equivalent to the renewal fees of the top four countries where EPs were most often validated. This means that if you validate in more than four UPC member countries, you can expect the UP to be more cost-effective than having to pay renewals for each validation of your classic EPs. This is one of many factors to consider when deciding whether to select a UP or not.

For an overview of factors you should consider with regard to UP protection, please refer to our UP brochure.

What is the Unified Patent Court?

The UPC is a new pan-European patent court that has exclusive jurisdiction over patents granted by the European Patent Office (EPO) for UPC countries, including infringement and validity actions. This applies to all previously granted and newly granted EPs. All UPs fall under this exclusive jurisdiction and this will also eventually apply to all classically validated EPs. There is, however, a transitional period of at least seven years within which it will be possible to ‘opt out’ classically validated EPs from the jurisdiction of the UPC.

For more information on the opt-out option, please refer to our UPC brochure.

When did the Unified Patent Court officially come into existence?

The Unified Patent Court launched on 1 June 2023. This is also the date on which the Unitary Patent system came into effect. The ‘sunrise period’, allowing early registration of opt-outs before the UPC came into existence, has now finished.

Will I be able to obtain patent protection in countries not participating in the Unitary Patent system?

Some countries are not yet participating in the UP system, including Ireland, Hungary, Romania, Croatia and Spain. Non-EU member states cannot participate in the UP system so the UP will not extend to Iceland, Norway, Switzerland, Turkey and, of course, the United Kingdom, which has withdrawn from the UP system due to Brexit.

However, you will be able to obtain patent protection in these countries by validating your patent as a classic EP.

What does the introduction of the UPC and the UP mean for all of my current European Patents?

Any existing EPs which have already been validated as ‘classic’ EPs will remain as such and cannot be converted into Unitary Patents.

Most currently-pending EPs, including EPs which have received a notification of intention to grant but which have not yet been formally granted, will be eligible for validation either as a Unitary Patent or as a classic EP. A request for validation as a UP must be filed within one month of the date of grant.

Classic EPs, including those which were granted before the new system entered into force, fall under the jurisdiction of the UPC by default. However, with respect to the jurisdiction of the UPC, you can decide within a transitional period of at least seven years (i.e. until at least 1 June 2030) to opt out your classic EPs. Should you choose to opt out, national courts will retain competence for your patents. Such decision can and should of course be taken on a case by case basis, i.e. you may choose to opt out some of your EPs, while deciding that others should fall under the competence of the UPC by not opting them out.

For guidance on which part of your EP portfolio should fall under the UPC’s competence and which might be better served by opting out, please refer to our UPC brochure.

In addition, our UPC consulting team is happy to assist you with your portfolio review and the strategic decisions to be made.

What is an opt-out?

An opt-out is a request to withdraw an EP from the jurisdiction of the UPC. Although the UPC will eventually have exclusive competence in respect of all EPs in UPC countries, it is possible to opt out of the system during a transitional seven year period, which is now in effect and will run until 1 June 2030. This may be extended to 14 years, i.e. to 1 June 2037. During this time, opt-outs can be registered for classic EPs and for pending European patent applications. However, patents which have been validated as UPs cannot be opted out.

Once opted out, the patent or application will be subject only to the jurisdiction of the national courts and not to the UPC. The opt-out lasts for the lifetime of the patent unless withdrawn by the patentee. If you do not opt out, the EP will fall automatically into the UPC system.

Please note that there are many factors to be taken into consideration when deciding whether to opt out. While we have listed these considerations in questions below, we have also summarised them in the opt-out brochure below.

Some of the factors may apply to your portfolio more than others; some may not be relevant to you at all. Each patent proprietor’s situation is unique and these considerations can easily turn into a complex analysis based on your individual situation, the complexity of your portfolio and overall market situation. Our dedicated UPC team is happy to assist in all UP and UPC related matters.

Why might I want to opt out my patent?

Factors that could point towards opting out from the UPC system might include:

  • This is a key patent protecting an important product and is therefore likely to be asserted or have its validity challenged.
  • The patent is fundamental to a particular technology area.
  • The patent has been monetised (e.g. there are licences or liens against the patent or it is relied upon for investment) and so is of key importance to your business.
  • You are aware or suspect that the patent is vulnerable to a validity attack.
  • The patent, or closely related patents, have been opposed at the EPO.
  • Litigation is common in your industry or technical area.
  • You have concerns about the quality or consistency of decisions in the new court.
  • You wish to make it harder for competitors to clear the way to enable launch of their product across the whole of Europe.
  • Enforcement in one national jurisdiction would have the same commercial effect as a pan-European enforcement through the UPC.

Why might I want to allow my patent to remain opted in?

Some of the key reasons you might want to allow your patent to remain opted in to the UPC system include:

  • You are aware of one or more potential infringers in multiple territories across Europe against whom you may wish to bring an infringement action.
  • You wish to provide a bigger disincentive to infringers who will be aware of the possibility of pan-European action, including injunctions and damages.
  • The patent is considered to be strong, with few concerns over validity, in particular if the patent has survived an opposition at the EPO.
  • The invention covered by the patent is not currently implemented in a product and hence is unlikely to be asserted or have its validity challenged; or the patent is one of a portfolio of patents of roughly equal value to your business.
  • There is a low risk of invalidity actions against the patent due to invalidity actions being uncommon in your field or within the group of competitors.
  • To prevent competitors from blocking you opting in by launching a national court action against the patent.
  • To access cheaper litigation options: Pan-European litigation in a single UPC action is cheaper than litigating in multiple separate European countries. This may be particularly important for patents protecting low value products.
  • The patent is directed to a process invention. Unlike some European countries, the UPC has a discovery process, and therefore may be particularly suitable for litigating process patents. Moreover, the UPC might be able to grant relief if the individual process steps are conducted in different European countries.
  • You wish to try out the new court and influence its development, for example by helping to frame its precedents and procedures.

I am a UK based patent holder. How does this affect me? Is the UK part of the Unified Patent Court and Unitary Patent system post-Brexit?

As the UK is no longer part of the European Union, the UK is not taking part in either of these systems. This means that a UP does not provide patent protection in the UK, and the UPC does not have direct jurisdiction over patents validated in the UK.

However, this does not have any effect on the UK’s membership of the European Patent Convention and EPO. Patentees are still able to obtain patent protection in the UK through the EPO as they always have done.

Due to our established presence in the UK and the EU, as well as our unique combination of competencies across our widely qualified patent attorneys in collaboration with our in-house Mathys & Squire Consulting team, we are well placed and fully prepared to advise and support you in carving out your strategy, as well as providing support for any litigation nationally and before the UPC.

Do supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) fall under the jurisdiction of the UPC?

SPCs which come into effect on or after 1 June 2023 fall under the UPC’s jurisdiction as long as they are based on Unitary Patents or European Patents which have not been opted out. At present it is unclear whether the UPC also has jurisdiction for SPCs which were already in effect prior to this date. SPC holders who are averse to the prospect of centralised revocation through the UPC may wish to take a precautionary approach and attempt to lodge opt-outs in respect of the patents underlying such SPCs in order to opt the SPCs out of the UPC’s jurisdiction.

Latest Mathys & Squire UPC news

One year in, the jury is still out on the new UPC as its caseload is still dwarfed by national courts. The UPC opened on June 1, 2023 with the aim of becoming Europe’s primary patent court. In its first year of operation, 205 cases were filed at the court (134 infringement cases, 39 revocation actions and 32 provisional measures actions). This represents around 15% of the total number of patent cases filed in Europe in 2021, when a total of 1,275 patent law cases were heard in the UK, Germany, France, Italy and the Netherlands combined.

|

Click here to read more

|

Click here to read more

Since June last year, patent proprietors have had the option of registering their European patents as Unitary Patents. Instead of having a bundle of national rights, proprietors have the option to maintain a single Unitary Patent right extending across the member states participating in the UPC. Partner Nicholas Fox, Managing Associate Laura Clews, and Technical Assistant Christopher Ashcroft discuss the EPO’s findings regarding the uptake of Unitary Patents.

|

Click here to read more

|

Click here to read more

|

Click here to read more

|

Click here to read more

|

Click here to read more

|

Click here to read more

100 days on from launch of Europe’s new patent court system

10,976 Unitary Patents have now been registered. This shows just how quickly the new system has grown in just a matter of weeks since its introduction. As well as the growing number of patents registered under the unitary system, the number of patent disputes heard in the new UPC is also gaining pace. 60 cases have already been filed in the court since it opened in June.

|

Click here to read more

Milan officially confirmed as host city for third branch of UPC Central Division

According to an announcement this week from the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, agreement has officially been reached to situate a third branch of the Unified Patent Court (UPC) Central Division in Milan. The Milan branch of the Central Division is expected to open by June 2024. This will supplement the two branches in Paris and Munich which opened on 1 June 2023.

|

Click here to read more

The official launch of the Unified Patent Court and the Unitary Patent system

Today, 1 June 2023, marks the launch of the Unified Patent Court (UPC) and the Unitary Patent (UP) system after many years of preparation by the European Union and its members. As of today, the UPC has jurisdiction for patent litigation throughout the 17 member states which have ratified the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court (UPCA). From today onward, newly-granted European patents can also be brought into force as Unitary Patents, providing coverage for the 17 UPC member states through a single validation.

|

Click here to read more

Unified Patent Court confirms allocation of cases in IPC sections A and C between Paris and Munich

After years of speculation and only two weeks before the launch, the UPC has provided an update on the third branch of the central division, which had originally been allocated to London. It was decided that any actions relating to patents in IPC section A will be assigned to the seat in Paris, and those relating to patents in IPC section C will be assigned to the Munich branch.

I

Click here to read more

The Unified Patent Court: five reasons to factor the UPC into your patent strategy

The start date for the Unified Patent Court will be 1 June 2023. This will also be the date on which the Unitary Patent system comes into effect. Thus, many patent holders are currently considering the merits keeping their EP patents ‘opted in’ to this system.

|

Click here to read more

What SMEs and universities need to know about the Unified Patent Court and the Unitary Patent system

The Unified Patent Court (UPC) will be coming into effect as of 1 June 2023 and with it the possibility of obtaining a Unitary Patent (UP). Now is the time for intellectual property (IP) right holders to identify the potential implications for their patent portfolio and devise an actionable strategy.

|

Click here to read more

Germany gives go ahead for Unified Patent Court – signalling long-awaited start of new EU patents system

Germany has finalised its approval of the Unified Patent Court (UPC), opening the UPC’s case management system and kicking off the court’s sunrise period from 1 March. The start date for the UPC is now 1 June 2023.

|

Click here to read more

Unified Patent Court may tilt playing field in favour of ‘patent trolls’

Under the new laws of the Unified Patent Court, a company facing a patent infringement claim will have as little as two months to prepare their defence. Such a short period of time may be too little for a company to build a proper, robust defence in a complex case. ‘Patent trolls’ are expected to deliberately refrain from notifying the alleged patent infringer of the pending litigation until the very last minute, leaving them at a considerable disadvantage.

|

|

Click here to read more

Supplementary protection certificates: ambiguity over the Unified Patent Court’s jurisdiction and opt-outs

The Unified Patent Court (UPC) – which is expected to launch in April 2023 – will have jurisdiction not only for patent litigation, but also for litigation involving supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) issued for medicinal products and plant protection products. The types of patents for which the UPC will have jurisdiction are well-defined, but analysis by Mathys & Squire’s SPC team has identified some areas of uncertainty when it comes to SPCs.

|

Click here to read more

Unitary patent and national prior rights – wider geographical limitation of protection

The unitary effect and the Unified Patent Court (UPC) system comes with a wider aspect as to validity against national prior rights (national applications with an earlier priority date but a publication after the priority date of the European patent (EP)).

|

Click here to read more

Unified Patent Court confirms panel of 85 judges is now in place

The Unified Patent Court – Europe’s new single point of contact for patent enforcement – took a major step forward with the confirmation that 85 of its judges from across the EU have now accepted positions on the court. After years of delay, the Unified Patent Court is now fast approaching and patent holders worldwide cannot afford to ignore it.

|

Click here to read more

Read more news
Subscribe to our mailing list

How can Mathys & Squire assist you?

With the advent of the UP and the UPC, there are many factors to be taken into consideration by anyone holding a European Patent. Some of them may apply to you more than others, some may not be relevant to you at all. We have attempted to provide you with a comprehensive overview via this Mathys & Squire UPC Hub, however – whilst comprehensive – this overview is not conclusive. Each patent proprietor’s situation is unique and the various considerations can easily turn into a challenging endeavour based on your individual situation, the complexity of your portfolio, overall market situation and many other factors.

Irrespective of where you are based and what considerations might apply to your situation, we are uniquely placed to assist you in any and all matters regarding the UP and UPC. This is thanks to our established presence and ranking in the UK as well as the EU, along with our combination of competencies across our widely qualified patent attorneys in collaboration with our in-house Mathys & Squire Consulting team.

We have put the required preparatory work in and have developed an in-depth understanding of the impact of the UP system and UPC on our clients. Thus, we are fully prepared to advise and support you in carving out your individual strategy, as well as – if necessary – litigate, both nationally and before the UPC.

In addition to this, a core group of our patent attorneys and consulting team have come together to form a highly specialised UPC team to put you in the best position to tackle your future strategy and approach.

Our team of patent attorneys is based in offices across the UK, plus Germany, France and Luxembourg, with decades of experience in patent litigation.

Contact Mathys & Squire today for more information on how our attorneys can assist you.

Meet the team
Contact us

Mathys & Squire is “currently disproving the assumption that UK firms cannot play a role in the UPC. They can, they want to, and clients obviously see reasons to choose them over other firms. This is another interesting surprise that underlines the wealth of possibilities when it comes to companies selecting representation.”

JUVE Patent

Training

Upskill your team with intellectual property law training

Get access to a range of bespoke intellectual property training packages, both in person and online. Each training syllabus is tailor made for you, and uses client case studies, where appropriate, to ensure that the material covered and examples given are relevant to you and your team.

Our training covers these key focus areas:

Our training services

Commercial training

We offer bespoke commercial training on the use of IP and commercial intelligence to inform you and your business of the wider technology landscape. We show you the approaches of wider industry. Knowing what others are doing can enable you to make more informed decisions relating to:

  • IP strategy and policy
  • R&D activities
  • Long term business plans
  • Investment / fundraising strategies
  • Potential partnerships or collaborations


In our commercial training we show clients how to use this information to guide innovation, mitigate business risks and to identify routes to market for your product or service. The learnings from the training can also be used to identify investors which may facilitate market access, or development partners to improve and expedite your route to market.

Valuation training

We offer IP valuation training for both university Tech Transfer Offices (TTOs) and corporate IP departments in bespoke online and in-person packages. Our IP valuation training courses are completely bespoke and highly interactive. The goal is that each participant will understand IP valuation methodologies and be able to undertake IP valuation exercises themselves. Each syllabus is tailor-made with the client, and uses client case studies, where appropriate, to ensure that the material covered and examples given are relevant to each group. Each course covers:

  • Relevance of IP valuation and its uses
  • Types of assets to be valued
  • IP valuation methodologies
  • Key terms in valuation and what they mean
  • Valuation methodologies for different asset types and different business stages
  • Case studies and in-class exercises
  • Final exam and certificate of completion
Patent research / landscaping training

In our bespoke patent and searching training programmes, we teach our clients the importance of understanding the wider technology market and landscape, and the best tools to use depending on the requirements. This training is always commercially focused and can help participants to validate investment decisions and to justify a particular research strategy. We cover topics such as:

  • General patent searching
  • Freedom to Operate (FTO) searching
  • Prior art searching
  • Patent landscaping
  • Technology market analysis
  • Competitor analysis
  • White space and gap analysis
Bespoke training packages

We also offer complete bespoke online and in-person training packages, covering any combination of the above topics, or additional IP related topics that the client would like covered. Provide us with an overview of what you would like covered in a course and we will develop a syllabus and course material to match, as well as developing suitable case studies and worked examples where appropriate. For example, topics covered in one of our online courses include patent searching, competitive analysis, and software licensing.

Get in touch with our team of experts

Valuation

Get a valuation of your brand and intangible assets

A valuation of your intangible asset / IP portfolio is an important way of gaining an understanding of how to retain and build business value, and also in identifying significant risks facing the business.

Do you have an innovative technology and want a free ballpark valuation in minutes?

Valuation of innovative technologies can be very challenging, especially in early-stage technology markets, due to the unpredictable nature of science, as well as the different hurdles along the commercialisation path. To help tackle this, we have created an interactive value calculator which can be used by stakeholders to gain an indication of the ballpark value of their intangible assets.

Simply fill out the below form to access our interactive valuation sheet. Within the calculator, enter in your inputs in the market, sales, investment, and (financial) factors sections, to receive an estimated net present value of your technology.

Do not hesitate to contact our consulting team if you have any queries about the tool, or if you would like a follow up regarding your results.

Download our interactive valuation tool

Download our interactive valuation tool

IP valuation

Our team uses defined and well recognised methodologies for the fair market valuation of IP, incorporating NPV calculations and discounted cash flows. We enable our clients to understand the assumptions made in the modelling and the methodologies, as well as the risks involved so they are well prepared for their negotiations.

Our valuation services

Valuation methodologies

Cost approach
Here we make an estimate of the costs of development of the IP to date, allowing for obsolescence. Typically, this looks at the cost to replicate the product or service offering. For this purpose, we usually look at the research and development (R&D) costs in developing a technology and the IP costs associated with protecting that technology. This can be used as a baseline to understand value (and to support balance sheet reporting) but does not represent the full future potential of an innovation.

Market value approach

A market-value based approach relies on the ability to identify transactions similar in character and for similar types of asset. Such an approach is familiar in real estate and art markets. This approach essentially benchmarks the assets and transaction of interest against those of similar assets, in a similar technology in the wider industry. IP is very broad in its nature, and transactions are often private, so this approach is often of limited applicability.

Future income model

This approach is based on making an estimate of the current value of future cash that can be attributed to the intangible assets, often using a premium income or a “Relief from Royalty” methodology. This approach, based on the net present value (NPV) of these future discounted IP related cash flows attributable to the IP generated by the business, considers risk through a combination of explicit risk discounting and a discounted cash flow (DCF) methodology. We identify specific risks to the business and apply discounts based on those risks. This can be very useful when speaking to investors as you can identify the risk in a technology proposition, the routes to mitigation of those risks and the impact this has on the value.

Investment

For startups, spin-outs and SMEs seeking investment and entering into fundraising discussions with investors, we provide IP valuations, supported in many cases by an IP audit. A valuation of your IP at this stage can show potential investors that you have identified and protected your intangible assets, allows you to identify risks to delivering the business projections and how these will be mitigated, and therefore increase confidence with the investor. In other cases, we work with investors who need to understand the full value of the intangible assets in a potential portfolio company prior to investment.

Transactions and licensing

We support our clients in valuing intangible assets and intellectual property ahead of asset transfers between companies and jurisdictions, where there may be tax and transfer pricing considerations. Our IP valuations are also used during M&A transactions and divestments, especially in technology and IP rich companies, where the value of the IP portfolio has a significant impact on the overall enterprise value. IP valuations using the relief from royalty methodology can be very useful to articulate the value of IP assets ahead of licensing discussions, and also to provide an insight into appropriate royalties for IP assets in specific technical fields. Furthermore, IP valuation can be a useful tool in cases of infringement, where estimates of damages need to be determined.

Administration and insolvency

Intangible assets and intellectual property are asset classes that can provide considerable value to a company, not least when it unfortunately enters administration or insolvency. IP valuation is a necessary tool for not only providing reassurance to creditors of the existence of value retained in the business, but also an indication of the price at which those assets could potentially be placed on the market.

Business support

Where a business is looking to grow its IP portfolio through acquisition, it is imperative that the business receives a free market valuation of that IP asset to ensure it is paying a fair price. Increasingly, as company value nowadays becomes ever more reliant on intangible assets, many businesses are seeking to reflect this value on their balance sheets. IP valuations of such assets are frequently used for this purpose. For businesses actively using their IP assets to generate revenues, but also seeking to inject capital into the business, IP-backed financing may be a suitable option, with a valuation required to underpin the use of the IP assets as security.

Get in touch with our team of experts

Start + sustain

Audit your intangible assets to start + sustain business growth

For early-stage companies and SMEs, it is extremely important to be aware of and audit your intangible assets, to determine how these contribute to your business and its revenues, and how they can be used to drive further growth.

Unlocking value for early-stage businesses

Our experienced and commercially focused team helps clients to unlock the value in their intangible assets, develop strategies to maximise their potential and ensure best practice is followed to keep these assets secure.

Our start + sustain services

Intangible asset audit

An intangible asset audit is an invaluable exercise for any business to undertake. When you commission us to carry out the audit, we:

  • highlight all the intellectual property and intangible assets in your business
  • deliver the audit using an interactive discovery and learning approach
  • inform you about each type of asset involves
  • provide tailored recommendations about each type as asset
  • give you an IP Strategy action plan for the coming 12 months
  • provide you with all of the above in a detailed written report

You can use the IP audit document to help you manage the business, plus as a tool to instill confidence in potential investors or grant
funders.

Best practice & policy

We advise our clients on best practice in the identification, protection and commercialisation of their intangible assets. These are aligned with their overall business strategy, while also assisting in the implementation of formalised IP/intangible asset policies or contractual agreements.

Innovation harvesting

Startups and SMEs are constantly innovating and inventing. Without a process in place, much of this innovation and associated potential new commercial opportunities, may be lost. We assist clients in implementing invention recording and innovation harvesting processes in-house. This ensures all new innovations are recorded and reviewed to ensure potential opportunities are not missed.

On-call IP management

Our clients have access to us for assistance with ad-hoc queries. As a valued client, we are available to assist and advise you on IP issues affecting your business. Where more significant help is required we will propose a separate project for this purpose.

Market explorer

Early-stage businesses require a well defined business plan to be successful. One of the important steps in developing a business plan is knowing your market, both in terms of application and also geographically. Our market explorer service provides an initial indication of main application areas or industries which you should target as well as the main geographies where your product or service might gain most traction.

Get in touch with our team of experts

Intelligence

Better IP business intelligence for your startup

Competitive IP business intelligence is not simply a matter of gathering information on your competition or the market. It is the analysis of this information, drawing conclusions to deliver insights into your competitors or the industry.

Gain market and competitor insight

Competitive IP business intelligence can paint a clearer picture of how you and your company fit into this overall context. We can assist you in a number of ways – see our intelligence services outline below.

Our intelligence services

Market intelligence

A market intelligence study is a detailed analysis of a specific market or industrial sector to assist a client in identifying the overall market for their technology, how they might address that market, what routes they may have and important players in that particular market – some of which may represent competition, whilst others may be future partners or collaborators. Knowing your market and your relative position allows you to effectively build a strategy for gaining a share of that market and a business plan on how to make that a reality.

White space / foresight analysis

Many companies operate in or wish to enter busy and heavily developed technology sectors, with significant amounts of competition. These sectors often represent large and potentially lucrative markets, but may also contain very large companies with large IP portfolios. In this context, a company can identify a niche for itself through a white space analysis – a gap in the market as yet unfilled. Through such an exercise, a business can develop a product or service to fill such an identified market need and develop suitable IP to help them protect their position in that white space.

Technology transfer / university spinouts

We support university technology transfer departments in numerous ways. Our main focus is helping researchers understand the reality of both the patent landscape in a technical domain, as well as the commercial potential for an innovation were it to be commercialised. Our technology transfer interventions range from early-stage investment appraisal (is it worth investing funds in this sector?) to IP audits for spin-outs to licensing packs for teams which prefer to license out their innovations to enable the maximum level of impact for their work.


Our consultants have worked in top UK research organisations (including Russell Group universities) and are attuned to the deliverables that the research sector seek to achieve. Our work has also been used by funding agencies to help finalise recommendations related to receipt of funding, based on a clear understanding of both the innovation landscape as well as current and future market opportunities.

IP brokerage

When a business or an individual creates a great invention or builds a revenue generating opportunity for a business, the reality is that often the individual or team does not have the time or the resources to take the invention to market. However, they still wish to generate revenue from the invention, perhaps through a sale or alternatively through licensing it out to others. Our team has both the expertise and experience to help clients extract value from their intangible assets. We deliver a focused programme of activity to ensure that the client’s intangible assets have the maximum possibility of being commercialised.

Get in touch with our team of experts

Grow

Better understand your intellectual property and business strategy

Understanding the value of a potential innovation or a brand is as important as understanding the technology or marketing behind it.

As companies grow, we will continue to advise on their portfolio and ensure that further protection is taken if required. Working with many other suppliers in this space has given us a network of relevant contacts and we regularly work with clients to facilitate valuation and finance based on their IP.

Strategies to grow your innovative business

For your startup or SME, quickly gaining market exposure and traction will give you the tools you need for healthy growth. Testing market interest is also vital for fundraising. Having a coherent business strategy and an aligned IP strategy will give you a clear competitive advantage. That’s how we can help you, and your business, grow.

Our grow services

Business strategy

Having a coherent business strategy and an aligned IP strategy is vital for an early-stage company or SME. Without a strategy, it will be challenging both to meet your growth targets and to persuade investors to join you in this journey of growth. We assist clients in preparing their business strategy, and planning how best to utilise their assets to enable sustainable long-term growth.

Competitive intelligence

For any company, it is very difficult to make a sensible proposition to your customers without knowing the market and your competition. We investigate your technical field or particular application area and identify the main entities already active in the field, as well as newer market participants who may represent potential development partners or licensees for your business.

Licensing & transactions

As your business grows, especially in the case of IP rich companies, it is highly likely that new opportunities for licensing or other IP or business transactions will arise. Our team is highly skilled in the licensing and brokerage of intangible assets and ideally placed to provide guidance on licensing conditions, royalties, locating licensees or discussing brokerage opportunities. We also provide support in IP litigation and the determination of damages from infringement.

Innovation landscapes

We can assist you in gaining further understanding of the overall technical landscape in which you operate. By undertaking an innovation landscape analysis, we will help you identify:

  • Who are the main companies in your field?
  • In which industries and areas of application are your competitors operating (but you are not) where can your innovation be applied?
  • Which approaches are competitors using to solve key technical problems?
  • What are the geographic regions of most interest for my innovation?
  • Who are the most suitable potential development partners or licensees?
Mergers & acquisitions

If your company is about to undergo an M&A exercise, from either the buy or sell side, it is imperative that due diligence of the IP assets be undertaken. This includes ownership of the rights, but also relevance of the IP assets to the business and its revenue streams. We can help you in this process and ensure you have full understanding of the intangible assets involved in any M&A transaction. We provide clear and definite due diligence opinions, both commercial and legal, regarding the status of the IP that underpins a potential transaction.

Portfolio management

Our team of experts will assist you in putting a clear IP strategy in place, and with it, a defined process for reviewing and managing your intangible asset portfolio. We work with you to align your IP strategy with your business goals, relevance to business activities, and risk.

Get in touch with our team of experts

Invest

Enhance investor confidence with a robust intangible asset portfolio

As any founder or company executive knows, in order to grow and get your product to market and gain traction, you need significant capital investment. Having a strong and robust intangible asset portfolio will considerably enhance investor confidence and provide reassurance on potential return on investment.

Establishing a suitable IP strategy

Our team of experts will assist you in putting a clear IP strategy in place, and with it, a defined process for reviewing and managing your intangible asset portfolio. We work with you to align your IP strategy with your business goals, to help enhance investor confidence.

Our invest services

Due diligence

An IP due diligence exercise is an assessment of the intellectual property rights which a company has developed, owns or licenses from another party, and the impact these assets have on the business. In this context, typically an IP due diligence process will involve:

  • Analysis of the chain of ownership of the intellectual property rights and any related encumbrances or liens against the IP assets
  • Assessment of the validity and enforceability of the assets, and their relevance to the business using the assets
  • Review of additional and adjacent IP rights, often related to registered IP rights, such as know-how and copyright
  • Current use of the IP assets in licensing agreements and any contractual obligations relating to the IP assets
  • Involvement of the IP assets in any litigation or any ongoing observations against the IP assets
Contract review

As part of our services we assist clients by reviewing their licence agreements and other contracts. We have significant experience in both drafting and executing contracts, and in providing contracts consultancy. We highlight potentially problematic issues in client agreements, then suggest ways to resolve such issues. These may relate to the terms of the licence, royalties, duration or technical and geographical scope of the portfolio being licensed. Our focus is on the commercial implications of the contract. In all cases, we flag these issues and draft text as appropriate.

Royalties

As part of our valuation process and in licence discussions, we regularly review royalty rates across specific industries and specific asset classes. We have access to extensive proprietary royalty rate databases and with this we can provide you with suitable royalty rate benchmarks based on:

  • Different licence/agreement conditions or unit types
  • Different asset types (patents, trade marks, know-how, etc.)
  • Different industries and sectors
Business plans

As part of our work with clients we frequently review company business plans and financial projections. We do this to gain an understanding of how the business is performing, how it will meet its projections and the importance of its IP assets in meeting those projections. As such, we are perfectly placed to assist clients in developing their business plans and ensuring that they have a clearly laid out plan detailing the business proposition, plans for growth and revenue generation, and the relevance of their intangible assets in delivering these revenues.

Get in touch with our team of experts

Mathys & Squire Consulting

Our intellectual property consulting team can support your business in capitalising your intangible assets

Whether you’re an early-stage startup with growth plans, or a large corporation seeking to expand your IP portfolio, our consultancy can help. Our 115 years of combined legal and commercial experience is at your disposal, to help you achieve your business goals. Regardless of your sector or developing technology, realise meaningful value from your intangible assets, get support with business growth and, ultimately, your success.

Advice to match your business’s pace as it grows and flourishes

Our core service model is simple and transparent. We understand that innovation businesses require flexibility and agility from their service providers, and thanks to our considerable experience, our service model has been built on this very foundation: we adapt and develop our advice to match your business’s pace as it grows and flourishes. Clients benefit from an unrivalled in-house capability; we work closely as a team drawn from across the Mathys & Squire business, to provide a holistic service that encompasses both the legal and commercial aspects of IP.

Our consulting services

Start + sustain

For early stage companies and SMEs, it is extremely important to be aware of your intangible assets, how these contribute to your business and its revenues, and how these assets can be used to drive further growth. Our experienced and commercially focussed team helps clients to unlock the value in their intangible assets, develop strategies to maximise their potential and ensure best practice is followed to keep these assets secure.

  • Intangible asset / IP audit
  • Best practice and policy
  • innovation harvesting
  • On-call IP management
  • Market explorer
Grow

At Mathys & Squire Consulting, we recognise the importance of startups and SMEs quickly gaining market exposure and traction. This tests market interest and is also vital for fundraising. We focus on the following factors to help our clients grow:

  • Business strategy
  • Competitive intelligence
  • Licensing and transactions
  • Innovation landscapes
  • Mergers and acquisitions
  • Portfolio management
Valuation

A valuation of your intangible asset portfolio is an important way of gaining an understanding of the company’s direction and also in identifying significant risks facing the business. We provide detailed valuation reports, supported by a comprehensive analysis of your business plan, financial projections, market analysis and IP portfolio, as well as benchmarking suitable industry royalty rates. Our team uses defined and well recognised methodologies for the fair market valuation of IP, incorporating NPV calculations and discounted cash flows. Our IP valuations require an understanding of the business, the wider industry, and the relevance of the IP assets to the business; these are used as a negotiation tool to help support strategic, business and investment decisions. We enable our clients to understand the assumptions made in the modelling and the methodologies, as well as the risks involved so they are well prepared for their negotiations.

  • Valuation methodologies
  • Investment
  • Transaction and licensing
  • Administration and insolvency
  • Business support
Invest

As any founder or company executive knows, in order to grow and get your product to market and gain traction, you need significant capital investment. Having a strong and robust intangible asset portfolio will considerably enhance investor confidence and provide reassurance on potential return on investment. We can help you deliver this through:

  • Intellectual property (IP) valuations
  • Contract reviews
  • Royalties
  • Business plans
Intelligence

Competitive intelligence is not simply a matter of gathering information on your competition or the market; it is the analysis of this information, drawing conclusions from this combined information to deliver strategic insights into your competitors or the industry, and how you and your company fit into this overall context. We assist our clients in this in a number of ways, namely:

  • Market intelligence
  • White space analysis
  • Technology transfer / University spin-outs
  • Disruptive technology intelligence
  • IP brokerage
Training

At Mathys & Squire Consulting, we offer a range of bespoke training packages, both in person and online on a number of our key focus areas:

  • Commercial training
  • Valuation training
  • Patent research and landscaping training
  • Bespoke training packages

Our full service offering is available via the Mathys & Squire Consulting brochure.

To further our IP consulting services, Mathys & Squire Consulting also works in partnership with copyright and data protection specialists, and technology transfer office in universities. For more information, visit our partnership page here.

Meet the team
Get in touch

What we do

Mathys & Squire Consulting helps organisations of all types to uncover and realise value from their intangible assets. Our industry-leading strategies for intellectual property, management solutions and practical IP advice services support startups, SMEs, corporates and university sector teams in their commercial growth objectives.

We work with businesses to develop IP management strategies. This enables clients to understand, review and implement positive actions that align IP with over-reaching goals. Our areas of IP expertise include due diligence, IP audits, valuation, consulting, training, brokering, licensing, monetisation and policy activities.

Contact us

Latest Mathys & Squire Consulting news

Trade mark FAQs

Getting started with a trade mark application can be overwhelming. Find out the basics, how trade marks work and how they can help you, in our FAQs.

What is a trade mark?

A trade mark is a ‘sign’ (most typically a word or logo) that distinguishes your brand from those of your competitors. It can be used to prevent anyone else using the same or similar mark for similar goods and services in the territory in which you trade. If you plan to sell your goods and/or services under a brand name, then the simplest step you can take is to register that brand name as a trade mark.

Why do I need to protect my trade mark?

Companies invest significantly in their brands and it becomes an integral element of their identity. Without legal protection (in the form of a registered trade mark), they have very limited ownership of that brand and will struggle to stop others ‘riding on their coat-tails’.

An example of this is a football club. The club will sell replica shirts, scarves and hats, as well as posters, lunch boxes, pens and even screensavers containing their mark, and not just here in the UK, but internationally to fans around the globe.

Much of the income for the club might come from the sale of branded goods. Counterfeit goods on which no royalty has been paid can make a serious dent in a business’s finances as well as damaging its reputation if the quality is not up to standard.

Trade mark protection provides you with the legal right to stop others from using the brand which you have invested in developing. Moreover, it is a company asset that can grow in value significantly. Coca Cola® is probably the best-known brand in the world and of its estimated value of $60 billion over 75% is associated with the brand alone. Little wonder that they take their trade marks very seriously.

If a company is precluded from using one of their core brand identifiers, or if somebody else attempts to use that brand for their own commercial activity, this can be extremely damaging to on-going sales. An example might be Toblerone®. Through its continued use of its triangular shape for chocolate and its various trade mark registrations it has the exclusive rights to produce triangular chocolate bars. Any competitor producing chocolate of a similar shape could be infringing Toblerone’s trade mark, and chocolate goods could, and have, been removed from the shelves and destroyed for such an infringement.

Does writing ‘TM’ after my logo give me any protection?

If your reputation for your goods and services is what makes the difference for you, then a trade mark is the best form of defence for your reputation. Don’t think that putting the letters ™ after your name is enough – they might well serve to deter some from misusing your brand, but the sign does not carry any legal weight in a courtroom fight.

Writing TM indicates to others that you consider the logo to be your trade mark, albeit that it is unregistered. Whilst in the UK unregistered trade marks are given some protection under common law, this is no substitute for registering a trade mark. Furthermore, there is little protection in most other EU countries for unregistered trade marks.

What trade marks should I cover?

A trade mark will only provide protection for the goods/services listed in the application. For administrative purposes, goods and services have been classified into 45 classes and a full list is available on the ipo.gov.uk website

I want to use a product name which I think is a trade mark owned by someone else but I don’t think they use it any more: can I just go ahead and register the trade mark for myself?

Unless you know for sure that a mark is not registered then you should seek professional advice from a trade mark attorney, who can conduct investigations and advise how to avoid any potential trade mark dispute. For example, if the mark is registered but is no longer needed by the third party, it may be possible to purchase the registration, or alternatively to apply to have it cancelled.

Can I trade mark the name of my business if someone in a different industry already has the name trade marked?

Probably; it depends on the goods or services for which the existing trade mark is registered. It is unlikely, for example, that car repairers would have a registered trade mark for goods and services which conflict with those provided by a clothing company. However, you should ask a trade mark attorney to conduct a search before an application is filed to register your trade mark; this should alert you to any potential difficulties.

Why not file a trade mark myself at a reduced cost?

Trade marks are not just branding tools, they are legal rights. This in itself suggests that the ‘easy route’ of filing independently should be avoided where possible. The UK Intellectual Property Office website will provide you with some guidance as to how to file and the types of goods/services included within each class. These are mere indications. There are thousands of terms that can be used to protect the relevant goods/services and the classes are not always obvious.

Only a legal representative who formulates these specifications on a daily basis will know how to protect your trade mark on the register and what to cover in order to ensure the broadest and most profitable protection By not seeking legal advice, you are taking the risk that you do not protect your commercial interests suitably from the outset, which could affect your business further down the line. Should you choose to protect your brand at a later date; there is a threat that someone else may have already filed a similar, if not identical, trade mark to yours already.

Even with legal representation, trade marks are affordable assets to obtain. They can provide protection for 10 years initially and this period can be renewed every 10 years. This is a legal asset that could serve you indefinitely. Why take such a risk at the imperative stages of a business and not seek legal representation?

Why spend on intellectual property in addition to all other associated branding costs?

The costs incurred in branding/rebranding, developing a logo, a website, promotional campaigns and so on, could all be completely wasted if you do not check whether that trade mark is free to adopt at the outset. If someone else uses or has registered the same or similar trade mark, they may have the legal right to stop you trading and you could therefore have to go through the entire re-branding process again.