On Wednesday July 11th 2018, Mathys & Squire Partner, Jeremy Smith, attended the third annual Cambridge Information and Intellectual Property Meeting (CIIPM) at Homerton College.
Founded in 2015 by Jane List of Extract Information and Stuart Newbold of Patent Search & Information Management, CIIPM is a platform for IP knowledge sharing.
Talks ranged from regulatory updates, legal insights and risk mitigation through to licensing, valuation and insurance and as such, the day was a great opportunity for those looking to make legal and commercial decisions with their IP in mind.
As an experienced patent attorney specialising in the protection of electronics, software and telecoms related inventions – and as a named inventor on a number of semiconductor device related patents – Jeremy has long since been an active part of the IP community both in Cambridge and elsewhere.
He noted that, “the event offered an opportunity to both share with other professionals involved in many aspects of IP protection and commercialisation, and learn from speakers with an interesting and varied mix of experience in the IP sector”.
For further conversation related to the protection of inventions and other intellectual property, please email Jeremy Smith on [email protected].
Jeremy has a first class honours degree in electronic and integrated circuit engineering from the University of Liverpool. Jeremy works across all areas of patent practice including: the preparation, filing and prosecution of patent applications before patent offices throughout the world; opposition both in Europe and elsewhere; due diligence activities; and litigation in the UK and elsewhere.
Mathys and Squire Partner, Anna Gregson, recently attended Biofocus 2018, a life sciences conference bringing industry, academics and experts together to discuss innovative initiatives and developments within the field.
Elaine Warburton of QuantuMDx kicked off the proceedings with an inspiring keynote presentation about working on handheld point-of care diagnostics that can be easily taken to, and used in, parts of the world without easy access to hospitals and laboratories. A real North-Eastern success story with global implications!
As with most conferences, Brexit was the mot du jour and a “State of the Nation” panel session discussed Brexit and the upcoming challenges companies, particularly in the biotech sector.
The general consensus? Companies need to be actively taking steps to make sure their businesses are ready for a post-Brexit environment – although this is difficult when so much uncertainty remains.
As such, SMEs need a strong support network to help them achieve commercial success and subsequent sessions showed how to put this theory into practice. Talks from NEPIC, the Centre for Process Innovation and the new National Horizons Centre (due to open March 2019) alongside showcase presentations from three North Eastern innovators, showed once again how the North East punches above its weight in technological innovation.
The afternoon focused a subject in which Newcastle University is a global leader – ageing research.
Newcastle’s cutting-edge research in this field has been a highlight of the BioFocus conference since the conference first ran in 2016 and this year was no exception as the second keynote presentation of the day linked cutting edge research in both age-related diseases (such as cancers and neurodegenerative conditions) and nanomedicine.
Anna noted that “with world class research and an excellent support network and thriving innovation ecosystem, biotech innovators in the North East are well placed to weather the challenges posed by Brexit – but they would be wise to bear in mind the old Axiom – to fail to prepare is to prepare to fail – and make sure they ready themselves for the changes ahead, and seek appropriate advice.”
For further conversation on all things Biotech, please contact Anna Gregson via [email protected]
Anna graduated from the University of Cambridge with a first class MA honours degree in natural sciences, specialising in pathology. She went on to obtain a PhD in biochemistry from Manchester University. Anna has experience in a wide range of subject matter in the fields of biotechnology and life sciences, including therapeutic antibodies, plant biotechnology and stem cells.
Mathys and Squire Partner, Craig Titmus, and Technical Assistant, Lionel Newton, attended “ON Helix” Translational Research Conference, hosted by One Nucleus at the Babraham Research Campus in Cambridge.
A leading event for the Life Sciences industry, the conference provides a platform for discussion and discovery, exploring the path from early stage innovation to the clinic.
With talks ranging from alternative funding, due diligence and licensing plans, through to relationship management and NHS partnership case studies, this event covered the full lifecycle of clinical innovation and highlighted the strategic advantages of collaboration over competition.
Mathys & Squire has worked closely with One Nucleus over a number of years and we are delighted to be One Nucleus’ preferred provider of Intellectual Property advice.
For any questions or queries relating to biotech, life sciences and IP strategy, please contact Craig Titmus via [email protected]
Craig’s practice covers diverse biotechnological subject-matter, with a particular focus on vaccines, diagnostics, therapeutic antibodies and peptide conjugates and biofuels. Craig has significant experience of European and international patent prosecution, and coordinates global IP strategies for a range of clients including start-ups, SMEs, universities, large corporations and the UK Government.
Mathys & Squire Partner and patent attorney, Caroline Warren, explores whether the Unified Patent Court (UPC) changes the landscape for court structures in the UK and EU.
Unified Patent Court: The Post-Brexit Structure
On 6 July 2018 the Cabinet met at Chequers to discuss the UK’s vision for the impending new relationship between the EU and the UK following the Brexit referendum.
The Cabinet statement summarising the meeting noted that “the Government’s vision for a future relationship, built around an economic partnership and a security partnership, remained fundamentally sound” but that the position needed to “evolve” to provide a “precise, responsible and credible basis for progressing negotiations” and achieve outcomes that are in the UK’s national interest and work for both the UK and the EU.
As such, the statement proposes a “joint institutional framework” to provide for the “consistent interpretation and application of UK-EU agreements”.
While the statement provides no further details on what such a framework might look like or how it might be implemented, one possible model could come from the proposed UPC system that was in development long before Brexit was first mentioned.
The UPC system provides a new international court that is “common to the member states” but lies largely outside the jurisdiction and control of the UK and EU court systems. The court system was designed while the UK was within the EU but, due to opposition for the project from Spain and Italy, the court was never an EU-led creation. Instead, the UPC will be a largely independent international court straddling the EU and UK jurisdictions.
Due to its unusual history and genesis, creation of the new court has required amendment of the Brussels 1 Regulation in order to recognise its jurisdiction and enable recognition of UPC judgements.
The work that has gone into this project over the past few years may now provide a mechanism by which alternative court structures can be established by mutual agreement between the EU and the UK, or at least serve as a model for such court structures.
Even in this international court, however, the CJEU retains a limited role in providing interpretation of aspects of the law in certain situations. Therefore, as always, politics will trump legalities and it remains to be seen whether the limited role of the CJEU in the proposed court structure will be acceptable to the newly-energised Brexiteers.
To read Caroline’s thoughts in The Times of London – please click the image below.
Caroline is part of the Mathys & Squire Brexit team and her practice includes management of large portfolios for multinational organisations, including representing clients at hearings before the European Patent Office. Caroline also enjoys advising small businesses on their IP strategy, both in the UK and internationally. For any questions about Brexit or the UPC, please email Caroline via [email protected].
Proper design registration is a ‘Mast’ as demonstrated by Mast-Jägermeister last week when their appeal to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) regarding shot glass design was rejected.
On 5th July 2018, the CJEU rejected an appeal by the well-known liquor producer Mast-Jägermeister related to a European registered design application directed to shot glasses.
In 2015, Mast-Jägermeister filed a registered design application including figures (not made publically available) that showed shot glasses along with bottles of Jägermeister. The bottles were apparently not intended to form part of the claimed design.
The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) Examiner objected to the application on the grounds that the representation of the design was not sufficiently clear, because the presence of the bottles in the design meant that it was not clear whether protection was being sought for the shot glasses or the shot glasses in combination with the bottles.
Mast-Jägermeister could have remedied the deficiencies either by adding “bottles” to the indication of product and dividing the design into separate parts, or by filing new views (which would have caused the application to be re-dated). However, they were apparently unwilling to use either of these remedies (presumably because either action would have made the registered design application somehow not fit for commercial purpose).
Accordingly, the Examiner took the view that the design application could not be accorded a date of filing, since the design for which protection was sought could not be identified.
Mast-Jägermeister’s subsequent appeals to the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, the General Court of the EU, and finally the CJEU focussed on whether the application clearly defining a scope of protection was indeed a requirement for according a data of filing for an application.
Mast-Jägermeister’s interpretation of the regulations was that, for a date of filing to be accorded, the design simply needs to include a representation of the design suitable for physical reproduction. This would mean that a design application would need only to pass a narrow formal examination to be accorded a date of filing.
However, the CJEU ruled that the concept of representation encompasses, in itself, the idea that the design must be clearly identifiable – so the appeal was rejected, and consequently Mast-Jägermeister’s registered design application could not be given a date of filing.
This case emphasises the vital importance of ensuring that the figures used in registered design applications are correct and cover what is intended to be covered before the application is filed, in particular where any re-dating of an application would be undesirable.
In this case, the originally filed figures in Mast-Jägermeister’s application fatally prejudiced their application, with the resulting deficiencies being incurable despite appealing to the highest possible level.
This article has recently been featured in The Patent Lawyer Magazine – click the image below to view!
For guidance on preparing figures suitable for use in registered design applications, or indeed questions about design registration in general, please contact a member of our Designs team:
Dani Kramer via [email protected]
Dani is a Partner and European Design Attorney with extensive experience of filing and prosecuting registered designs in the UK, via EUIPO and internationally. Dani works for a number of large corporations managing their international patent portfolios. His focus is on the fields of internet television, software, electrical and electronic engineering, information technology, microprocessors, semiconductor devices, and communication technologies.
Max Thoma via [email protected]
Max has a Masters in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Cambridge. Max works primarily on drafting and prosecuting patent applications in the UK, Europe, and the US and has experience in contentious matters. Alongside his patent work, Max works on preparing, filing and prosecuting Registered Designs in the European Union, as well as in many overseas jurisdictions.
Mathys and Squire Partner, Margaret Arnott, and Managing Associate, Laura West, hosted a workshop organised by the Asian Coalition Against Counterfeiting and Piracy (ACACAP) in conjunction with the Anti-Counterfeiting Group (ACG) on Thursday 5th July.
The discussion focused on: “Intelligence Led Anti-Counterfeiting Enforcement Strategies from Asia to the UK”, exploring and sharing effective ways to mitigate the risks of counterfeiting in Asia and the UK. There was also a lively debate regarding the Belt and Road initiative proposed by the Chinese Government, which is set to have a marked impact on the current enforcement strategies of many brand-owners.
The event was attended by representatives of a number of well-known brands, who are at the forefront of tackling IP infringement and counterfeiting within their businesses. The delegates heard from brand protection professionals including representatives from the ACG and ACACAP, the International Centre for Counter Terrorism and the Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU).
Tailored specifically to brands with manufacturing or trading interests in Asia, the workshop and debates explored effective ways of utilising the sharing of intelligence and collaboration in mitigating the risks of counterfeiting in Asia and the UK.
Laura West, event chair, noted that “the workshop brought together a fantastic range of individuals who experience first-hand the damage of counterfeiting activity here in the UK and overseas. The aim of the event was to explore recent trends in counterfeiting activity (both locally and internationally), share experiences regarding the threats that have been faced over the past year or so and to discuss possible strategies and solutions for tackling this ever-present problem. For me personally, the fantastic presentations and active debates throughout the day highlighted three key ‘take-home’ messages…”
- Counterfeiting is not a victimless crime and should be a high priority to government and law enforcement officials, particularly as there is evidence to suggest that it often delivers the funding required by criminals to pursue more serious criminal activity such as terrorism;
- Flexibility is key when undertaking a brand protection role. Counterfeiters are good at what they do and will adapt and change their modus operandi as soon as you successfully remove one of their (often numerous) sales channels;
- One of the best ways to tackle this issue on a wider scale is to effectively gather intelligence and to share this information (where possible) with other businesses and organisations such as the ACG and ACACAP who are in regular discussion with relevant stakeholders and law enforcement. A lot of evidence is not being effectively collected or, when it is collected, is not leaving the confines of that business or organisation. The sharing of this intelligence will help identify where infringers are targeting a number of different brands and therefore where an effective strategy would be to group together and share resource in tackling the individuals as well as possible links and connections that may otherwise be missed and that may help identify the source of counterfeit product.
If you are looking to protect your brand or would like to know more about trade marks in general, please email Laura West via [email protected]
Laura is a Chartered Trade Mark Attorney with experience in the filing, prosecution and enforcement of trade marks all over the world. She has a strong focus on business growth through imports, exports and global portfolio management and often works closely with Customs and Trading Standards in assisting her clients protect against counterfeit goods.
Margaret has been a trade mark specialist in private practice since 1992. She is a registered UK and European trade mark and design attorney and a member of the Institute of Trade Mark Attorneys. Margaret has considerable experience in advising a broad range of clients, including multinational corporations, in the development, management, exploitation, protection and enforcement of their trade mark portfolios.
ACACAP was founded in May 2014 and is based in Singapore with partners in over 30 Asian countries. ACACAP provides local expertise, investigations and enforcement actions to protect brands against counterfeiting and serves as a forum to discuss alternative solutions to counterfeiting and piracy.
The ACG represent the interests of: UK and international manufacturers, distributors and retailers; lawyers; trade mark agents; and brand protection specialists, campaigning to change perceptions of counterfeiting as a harmless activity and expose it as a serious organised crime.
The event was sponsored by Incopro.
Laura Clews, Associate at Mathys and Squire, recently sat with the team at Food Matters Live to talk about the IP on our plate.
From R&D and packaging to food technology, processing and the composition of ingredients, Laura outlined the various ways companies seek to protect their innovations in this competitive industry.
Laura is a Chartered Patent Attorney and European Patent Attorney with experience in the drafting and prosecution of patent applications in the UK, Europe and worldwide. A member of our Food and Beverage team, Laura has recently written articles regarding cell-cultured meat and was interviewed by the host of BBC Radio’s The Food Chain series, Emily Thomas, to discuss trade secrets in the food industry.
To watch the Food Matters Live video in full, please click below.
Food Matters Live is an annual event exploring the relationship between food, health and nutrition. Our dedicated Food and Beverage group has extensive experience in the industry and understands the challenges faced by companies in this highly competitive market. Members of the team will be attending Food Matters Live 20-22 November 2018 in the London Excel Centre and will be ready to talk all things food and IP.
Another exciting announcement from the Mathys & Squire team! David Miller and Martin MacLean, both partners and specialists in the fields of Life Sciences and Pharmaceuticals, have been nominated by their peers to feature in the 2018 edition of Who’s Who Legal: Patents.
Since 1996 Who’s Who Legal has identified the foremost legal practitioners and consulting experts in business law based upon comprehensive, independent research.
This is Martin’s third inclusion in Who’s Who Legal, having been nominated in 2016, 2017 and now 2018. He has also been ranked in the latest edition of IAM Strategy 300 – The World’s Leading IP Strategists 2017. Legal 500 (2017)
David, who has a master’s degree in natural sciences from the University of Cambridge and a master’s degree in the management of intellectual property (with distinction), from the University of London, is described in WWL as being “a seasoned expert with experience in handling examination and opposition proceedings at the highest level.”
Congratulations to both!
For more information about this, or any other people news, contact Marketing Director, Greg Birmingham on [email protected].
The N8 AgriFood Conference, hosted in Liverpool in June, brought researchers and industry together to review innovative approaches in food systems and sustainability.
Anna Gregson, Laura Clews and Dean Houston, members of the Mathys & Squire Agri-tech and Food team, attended the fascinating two-day event. A range of speakers explored hot topics within the industry, including sustainable consumer choices, new technologies in food manufacturing & processing, food waste, social innovation in food poverty and supply chain resilience. Mathys & Squire Partner, Anna Gregson, chaired a talk that considered the importance of intellectual property when innovating in the Agri-food industry.
Anna commented, “This well-attended annual event brings together stakeholders from all disciplines within the Agri-Food sector. The event discussed some fascinating and important topics regarding the critical issue of food sustainability, discussing the challenges ahead as well as offering solutions for the future. There was a real buzz about the event which brought together key players from industry and academia to exchange ideas and explore new collaborations. Mathys & Squire were proud to sponsor the event!”
Please click here for more information about our Food & Beverage team, and Agri-tech team.
Our team at N8Agrifood Conference discussing the importance of IP in food technology!
Mathys & Squire is delighted to announce two partner promotions in the firm in June.
Both Peter Arch and Craig Titmus have been promoted from Managing Associates to Partners, highlighting the firm’s ongoing commitment to career development.
Peter, who specialises in Life Sciences and Chemistry commented, “I’m very excited to have joined the partnership at such an ambitious and people focused firm, where our life sciences team continues to go from strength to strength”.
Craig, who also specialises in Life Sciences and Chemistry and is based in the firm’s Cambridge office said, “I am delighted to have joined the partnership at Mathys & Squire – it’s a real privilege and I very much look forward to contributing to the continued success of the firm”.
Mathys & Squire is dedicated to developing its people and this is yet another demonstration of our “One Firm | One Team” culture which is driven throughout our business. We wish Peter and Craig all the very best in their new roles and we know they will be immensely successful as partners.
Congratulations!
For more information about this, or any other people news, contact Marketing Director, Greg Birmingham on [email protected].
