'Trunki' Supreme Court Decision

As we previously reported, the high profile ‘Trunki’ Registered Design dispute finally came to an end as the UK Supreme Court upheld the UK Court of Appeal’s judgement that PMS International’s ‘Kiddee Case’ product does not infringe Magmatic’s European Community Registered Design for the Trunki.
 
Now that the dust has settled, we are pleased to provide some practical guidance for designers and businesses wishing to protect their designs in the light of this decision.
 
Brief review of the key points of the decision

In the decision, the Supreme Court confirmed that the tonal contrasts between the darker wheels (and strap) and the lighter body in Magmatic’s Registered Design (see images directly below) could not be ignored as an immaterial features of the design. The Registered Design could therefore only be interpreted to cover: both the shape of the suitcase and its two-tone nature (and not merely its shape, as contended at first instance and later criticised).

 



Above: Exemplary representations from Magmatic’s European Registered Design for the Trunki. Note the visible tonal contrast between the wheels and the body.
 

 
Above: PMS International’s alleged infringing article – the ‘Kiddee Case’. Note the mostly covered wheels.  

The Supreme Court also reinforced the Court of Appeal’s criticism that there was a failure at the High Court “to give proper weight to the overall impression of the [Registered Design] as an animal with horns, which was significantly different from the impression made by the Kiddee Case, which […] were either an insect with antennae or an animal with ears”.
 
Practical Guidance

The mainstream media has been largely sympathetic to Magmatic, with the broad consensus being that this decision is a heavy blow for British designers as the Supreme Court has failed to protect designers.
 
However, for many practitioners, the Supreme Court’s decision comes as little surprise and it is instead a welcome confirmation of what many had suspected. The decision emphasised the importance – and almost sole importance – of representations within a Registered Design, and the thoughtfulness that should be put into the preparation of suitable representations, rather than merely using whatever happens to be to hand.
 
In determining the representations to be used, there is a fine balance to be struck between validity and the scope of protection.  The Supreme Court offered guidance in this respect: “an applicant is entitled to make any number of applications. More broadly, it is for an applicant to make clear what is included and what is excluded in a Registered Design, and he has wide freedom as to the means he uses.” 
 
As a result, for robust protection, multiple Registered Designs can – and should – be used to cascade protection (akin to patent claims), with tone, colour, shape, highlighting, and disclaiming used in various combinations to protect actual embodiments and – separately – key design features also.  This approach should provide thorough protection for the look and feel of a design at a comparatively low cost compared to other forms of IP protection.
 
With all of this in mind, one cannot help wonder whether Magmatic would have succeeded in their action against PMS had they also filed line drawing representations and/or CAD drawings in a single tone.
 
To this end, far from failing designers, European Registered Designs still offer the advantages of:

  • Cost effectiveness
  • Economies of scale
  • An absolute monopoly
  • Wide territorial coverage
  • Options for tailoring protection
  • A long term (25 years)
  • A 12-month self-disclosure grace period
  • Keeping the design secret (for up to 30 months)

Registered Designs are therefore as effective as ever, and we would certainly contend, fit-for-purpose, but –crucially – only when they are used properly – which, as this decision emphasises, is all about getting your drawings right.
 
For advice on how Registered Designs can be used to protect your designs or for further commentary regarding this judgement, please do not hesitate to get in touch.

Meet the team Make an enquiry

Meet
the team

Lorraine Aleandri
Associate
Peter Arch
Partner
Margaret Arnott
Partner
Anthony Ball
Associate
Nadège Beynon
Associate
Giuditta Biagini
Associate
Catherine Booth
Partner
Tom Bosworth
Technical Assistant
Edd Cavanna
Associate
Michael Charlton
Associate
Jane Clark
Partner
Laura Clews
Managing Associate
Douglas Cole
Managing Associate
Clare Collins
Technical Assistant
Paul Cozens
Partner
Olivia Creemer
Associate
Charlie Dempster
Managing Associate
Adela Dinca
Trade Mark Assistant
Posy Drywood
Partner
Siobhan Durran
Associate
Jessica Eastwood
Technical Assistant
Alex Elder
Technical Assistant
Rachael Evans
Technical Assistant
Gerold Fiesser
Partner
Hazel Ford
Partner
Thomas Fraser
Associate
Liam Gannon
Technical Assistant
Sally (Lingjun) Gao
Technical Assistant
Stephen Garner
Partner
Bethany Gibbs
Managing Associate
Sam Giles
Associate
Daniel Goldberg
Associate
Peter Gray
Partner
Anna Gregson
Partner
Philippa Griffin
Partner
Andrea Hadfield
Associate
Christopher Hamer
Partner
Annabel Hector
Of Counsel
Christopher Hirsz
Of Counsel
David Hobson
Managing Associate
Dean Houston
Technical Assistant
Peter Humby
Technical Assistant
Jonathan Israel
Technical Assistant
Richard Jaszek
Managing Associate
Gary Johnston
Partner
Ilya Kazi
Partner
Miranda Kent
Associate
Dani Kramer
Partner
Ekaterina Langford
Associate
Sean Leach
Partner
Lianne Leith
Associate
Jerome Luchesa Smith
Technical Assistant
Alan MacDougall
Partner
Martin MacLean
Partner
Peter Mansfield
Of Counsel
Grace Mason-Jarrett
Technical Assistant
Conor McGuinness
Technical Assistant
Andrea McShane
Managing Associate
David Miller
Partner
Samantha Moodie
Managing Associate
Dylan Morgan
Technical Assistant
Matthew Morton
Associate
Harry Muttock
Associate
Bethany Myers
Technical Assistant
Lionel Newton
Technical Assistant
Daniel Nicholls
Associate
Amy Nick
Technical Assistant
Joe O'Gorman
Technical Assistant
Szymon Pancewicz
Technical Assistant
Oliver Parish
Technical Assistant
James Pitchford
Partner
Monika Rai
Partner
Daniel Ramos
Associate
Juliet Redhouse
Managing Associate
Arthur Roberts
Technical Assistant
Alexander Robinson
Associate
Clare Roskell
Technical Assistant
Harry Rowe
Associate
Toby Simpson
Partner
Jeremy Smith
Partner
Thomas Smith
Associate
Lucy Speechley
Technical Assistant
Helen Springbett
Technical Assistant
Oliver Stocks
Technical Assistant
Michael Stott
Partner
Vicki Strachan
Of Counsel
Norbert Szalai
Associate
Rebecca Tew
Of Counsel
Max Thoma
Associate
Ryan Thompson
Technical Assistant
Craig Titmus
Partner
Aymeric Vienne
Managing Associate
Caroline Warren
Partner
Kirstin Wenck
Associate
Laura West
Managing Associate
Andrew White
Managing Associate
James Wilding
Partner
Leonard Wright
Technical Assistant
Max Ziemann
Technical Assistant